Is is really worth it to syndicate your content across the
web? Does article syndication really serve users as an effective advanced SEO
technique, or is it really just a flawed and misguided idea?
Some SEO professionals still hold on to the idea that
article syndication is a great way to attract the attention of search engine
crawlers, and to improve your site’s indexing power and increase visibility.
Often times an SEO marketer will recommend syndication as a way to spread the
reach of your site’s content, and that by posting links to your content on
multiple article directories, such as EZine.com, you can easily generate more
site traffic and higher visibility.
Matt Cutts, however, sees syndication a little differently,
hinting at the possibility that Google penalizes the mass syndication of
content, rendering it virtually useless as an SEO technique. As the head of
Google’s Webspam team, Matt Cutts is constantly working on changes to Google’s
algorithm, devising better ways for Google to parse out and punish those
relying on spammy, recycled or mass-syndicated content. Matt Cutts, according
to Jennifer Slegg of Searchenginewatch.com,
has recently pointed to the potential ineffectiveness of mass content
syndication, stating that an attached content link from an article directory may
no longer be a good way to boost site visibility, and that Google may now be
keeping a watchful eye on this practice.
“In my particular opinion,” says Cutts, “article
directories, and just trying to write one article and syndicating it wildly or
just uploading it wildly to every site in the world, hoping that everyone else
will download it and use it on their site…I wouldn’t necessarily count on that
being effective.”
Slegg adds that SEO professionals, the people constantly
looking for better, more advanced SEO techniques to improve their clients’ site
visibility, have for the most part abandoned the use of article syndication and
mass directories, and that those who continue to jump into mass article
syndication are ignorant of the potential implications. She points to a recent
statement by Cutts regarding a potentially proactive approach by Google to
punish the practice.
“We certainly have some algorithmic things that…probably
(make) it a little less likely to be successful now compared to a few years
ago,” says Cutts. “My recommendation would probably be to not upload (an)
article like that.”
No comments:
Post a Comment